James A. Kahl
Jim Kahl represents corporations, trade associations, advocacy groups, and tax-exempt organizations, as well as political action committees (PACs), ballot committees and other political committees, regarding federal and state campaign finance, lobbying, and government ethics laws and regulations. With an extensive background working in and practicing before federal agencies, Jim helps clients navigate the complex regulatory maze that impacts political activity.
Here are just some of the ways that Jim helps Whiteford’s clients:
- Advises clients regarding their ability to make political contributions to federal, state and local candidates using corporate, PAC or personal funds, and their ability to provide gifts or other items of value to public officials.
- Helps clients comply with their registration and reporting obligations under federal and state lobbying laws and the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
- Audits clients’ political activities, and develops tailored compliance programs and policies to minimize risks.
- Provides political law training programs to clients’ executives and key employees so that they understand the legal risks posed by political activities and know the steps to take to keep their employer out of trouble.
- Represents clients before federal and state campaign finance, lobbying and ethics regulators in regard to agency audits, investigations, advisory opinion requests, and other regulatory matters.
The entirety of Jim’s legal career has involved representing clients before or serving in senior legal positions in U.S. government agencies. From 2002 to 2007, Jim served as Deputy General Counsel of the Federal Election Commission. There he helped lead the 130-person Office of General Counsel in conducting investigations of potential violations of campaign finance laws, and advising the FEC in connection with rulemakings, advisory opinions, and audits of political committees.
Prior to that, Jim was a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Hopkins & Sutter, served as the principal deputy to the General Counsel at the Small Business Administration, and was the number two-ranking official at the U.S. Office of Special Counsel – the agency that enforces whistleblower protection laws and the Hatch Act across the federal government. On a daily basis, Fortune 100 companies, major trade and professional organizations, and other entities and individuals engaged in political activities turn to Jim Kahl for practical and cost-effective political law compliance advice and solutions. Jim is a frequent speaker and author on political law issues. He also filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the prevailing party in the landmark case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
Memberships & Activities
- Member: American Bar Association
- Member, ASAE
- ASAE Legal Section Council Member
- Vestry and Executive Committee Member, St. Paul's Church, Alexandria, Virignia
Author: "Nonprofit Lobbying: The Rules You Need to Know," ASAE (February 2017)
Presentation: "Supporting Candidates, Growing Your PAC & Increasing the Effectiveness of Your Government Affairs Program" ASAE (May 2016)
Author: "Election 2016: Know the Rules for Supporting Candidates," ASAE (March 2016)
Author "Citzens United, Super PACs, and Corporate Spending on Political Campaigns: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going?", The Federal Lawyer (June 2012)
Author "Managing Risks of Corporate Political Activity", Staffing Success (November/December 2009)
Author "FEC Must Protect Commerical Speech From the Excesses of McCain-Feingold Bill", Advertising Age (October 15, 2007)
DC Federal District Court Voids FEC Independent Expenditure Reporting Rule - Expands Donor Disclosure
In an opinion released on August 3rd, US District Court Judge Beryl Howell greatly expanded the FEC donor disclosure reporting requirements for independent groups – like Section 501(4) and 501(c)(6) organizations – that sponsor independent expenditures and other candidate advocacy communications. The court delayed the implementation of its ruling for 45 days to give the FEC time to draft interim rules.
Nonprofit organizations are often overly cautious in speaking out about their causes and interacting with candidates in election years for fear of violating a complex set of laws and rules. You can and should participate in the election-year conversation. Here’s how.
IRS Ignites Political Firestorm by Eliminating the Requirement for Most Nonprofit Organizations to Submit Confidential Donor Information to the IRS
On July 16, 2018, the IRS announced that it has eliminated the requirement for most nonprofit organizations to provide confidential donor information to the IRS on Schedule B to their annual IRS Form 990. Although limited in scope and with no impact on public transparency, the change has significant political ramifications and has ignited a firestorm of support and condemnation across the political spectrum. This includes a partisan Senate Finance Committee vote and delay in the Senate confirmation vote on the new IRS Commissioner.
DC Partner Jim Kahl and Nancy Bukar, Sodexo Vice President of Government Affairs & Assistant General Counsel, co-presented to The Association of Corporate Counsel (National Capital Region) in a webcast last Tuesday on “Election Year Corporate Political Activity: Understanding the Legal Risks and Strategic Opportunities.”
A recent article in Associations Now features DC-based political Law partners Jim Kahl and Jeff Altman. “Whether you see an opportunity to advance your agenda or a need to defend members’ interests, it’s wise to reexamine your government relations strategy right now,” says Kahl. “What we know now is that a Republican majority means organizations need to be ready to respond to bills immediately,” says Altman. “With the new Congress, legislation will be passed very quickly.”
The Federal Election Commission has made minor adjustments to some of the individual and PAC contribution limits for the 2017-2018 election cycle. The amount that individuals and non-multicandidate PACs can give to federal candidates remains at $2700 per election to each federal candidate. Since primary and general election contests are viewed as separate “elections,” an individual or a non-multicandidate PAC may contribute a total of $5400 to a federal candidate. The $5,000 per year individual contribution limit to PACs is also not affected.
Supporting Candidates, Growing Your PAC & Increasing the Effectiveness of Your Government Affairs Program
- Political Contributions
- Using & Growing Your PAC
- Role of Association Members
- Lobbying & Gift Risks
- Compliance & Strategic Takeaways
Elections pose abundant opportunities for associations to support candidates aligned with members' interests. But the law governing election-related activities by associations has shifted drastically in recent years. Before your organization supports or opposes political candidates, be sure you know the rules.
Another election year is upon us, and once again federal and state candidates are on track to raise and spend unprecedented sums for their election efforts. That means corporations, trade associations, 501(c)(4) advocacy organizations, their political action committees (“PACs”), leaders, members and donors will be inundated with political contribution requests. They may also be asked to help candidates and political parties in other ways, such as hosting fundraisers or providing in-kind contributions of goods or services.
Jim Kahl will deliver opening remarks to attendees at ASAE's Association Law Symposium welcome breakfast. Jennifer Jackman and Tiffany Releford will co-present "Human Resources and Employment Law: Key Topics for Your Association." The presentation will focus on best practices to minimize liability for discrimination and harassment claims and review topics such as protected classes, essential policies addressing harassment and discrimination (for employees and members/directors), hiring do’s and don’ts, responding to complaints of harassment, and termination of employment.
ACC/NCR Live Webcast - Nonprofits & Associations Forum: "Maximizing Impact Through Volunteers, While Minimizing Associated Risks" - WTP Speaking & Sponsoring
Jennifer Jackman and Jim Kahl co-present a live webcast for both in-house and virtual attendees for the Association for Corporate Counsel (National Capital Region), hosted in our DC office. Jennifer and Jim will be joined by Angela Ciccolo, Chief Legal Officer of Special Olympics, and Rhonda Lees, Senior Counsel of the American Bankers Association. The presentation will focus on how to utilize volunteers to maximize an organization’s mission impact, covering best practices and compliance tips for managing volunteers.
Election Year Corporate Political Activity: Understanding the Legal Risks and Strategic Opportunities - WTP Speaking & Sponsoring
Jeff Altman and James Kahl will present at the ASAE Government Relations Symposium discussing lobbying, PAC and government ethics compliance.
ACC National Capital Region: Corporate Political Activity in 2017, Legal Risks and Strategic Opportunities - WTP Speaking
James Kahl will present at the Association of Corporate Counsel National Capital Region's Corporate Political Activity in 2017 event.
On January 13, WTP hosted a webinar on "Federal Lobbying & Ethics Rules in 2017: Is Your Organization Ready?"
We are pleased to announce the inaugural issue of Whiteford Political Law Notes -- Whiteford, Taylor & Preston’s quarterly political law newsletter. Our objective is to provide our clients and friends with concise analysis of developments in the fast-changing field of federal and state campaign finance, lobbying, tax, and government ethics laws and rules.
Washington, DC -- Whiteford Taylor & Preston announced today that nationally recognized political law attorney James A. Kahl has joined the firm and will reside in its Washington, DC, office. Mr. Kahl joins Whiteford Taylor with significant experience in both the public and private sectors.